balance, inspiration, motivation, life, scene, wander, journey, explore, discover, uncover, achieve, succeed, wellness, wellbeing, creative, portrait, landscape, zen, spa, relaxation, tranquility, peaceful, raft, build, work, design, create, scissors, notes, stickies, pencil, motivation, discover, discover, discover, uncover, wellbeing, wellbeing, wellbeing, create, create, create, create, create
Photo by picjumbo_com on Pixabay

Client Delivery

Part of Project documentation and decisions

Keeping a change log inside a project workspace

Track proposed project changes, their impact, decisions and implementation in a log connected to the current plan.

A project change log should show each proposed change, its assessed effect, the authorised decision and any work needed to apply it. Keep it near the current plan and reference earlier plan versions. Readers should be able to tell pending requests from approved changes.

Project Management Standards Reference

Source: APM
Association for Project Management
Focus Areas
Change control, information management, configuration management

Set the threshold for an entry

Log a request when it may change an agreed deliverable, acceptance rule, date, cost or another controlled part of the plan. An ordinary task update or spelling correction may need edit history without becoming a change request. Make the local threshold clear to contributors.

Give each request an ID, requester, date, description, reason, affected plan version and decision owner. Preserve the request as submitted, then add the assessment and outcome separately. Rejected and deferred requests remain useful records.

Stage / What the entry should show

Proposed
What is requested and why
Assessing
Affected work, options and likely consequences
Awaiting decision
Who can decide and what information is missing
Decided
The outcome, decision-maker and date
Implementing
Updates required after approval
Resolved
Evidence of implementation, rejection or another recorded outcome

These states are suggested. A deferred request needs a review trigger rather than disappearing into a closed queue.

Assess before changing the plan

Compare the request with the approved baseline. Consider the effects on scope, quality, time, resources, cost and risk where relevant. Record important uncertainty and options. An estimate in the log is not yet an authorised commitment.

For example, an additional review round might affect a deliverable, reviewer availability and a later milestone. The decision-maker can approve, reject or defer it after seeing those effects. A client engagement may also require a separate contractual or client-authorisation step.

Connect the log to the workspace

Keep the log in a project area that authorised people can reach. Name its maintainer and reference the relevant plan version, deliverable and affected tasks. After approval, assign updates and check that the changed records match the decision.

Activity or version history may show that a field changed without explaining why the change was authorised or what else it affects. Use the log for that decision trail. If the workspace has no structured register, a maintained table with stable IDs can serve the same purpose.

Review open requests

At project reviews, check requests awaiting assessment or decision, approved changes still being applied and deferred requests whose review trigger has arrived. Give each a decision owner or next-action owner. For an implemented change, retain references to the previous and resulting plan versions so a later reader can understand what changed.

More from Client Delivery

Client Delivery

Agile project software

Agile software is useful when it helps a team choose work, limit overload and learn from delivery. A board alone does not establish a good process. Choose tools …